Analysis of the Relationship between Sediment Budget Components and Topographic Metrics at the Hillslope Scale in Control Sub-watershed of the Khamsan Representative-paired Watershed

Document Type : Research

Authors

1 Former Ph.D. Student, Department of Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

4 Professor, Department of Agraria, University Mediterranea of Reggio Calabria, Italy

10.22092/wmrj.2025.367713.1602

Abstract

Introduction and Goal
Given the critical importance of soil and humanity's reliance on it for food production worldwide, especially in developing countries, one of the most important and fundamental problems today is soil erosion and degradation. The average soil erosion in the country is estimated to be around 16.5 tons per hectare, and soil erosion in Iran is approximately 2 to 2.5 times higher than the average in Asia and 5 to 6 times higher than the global average, predominantly occurring in slopes and hilly areas due to poor vegetation cover. Considering the advancements and development of erosion and sediment methods, along with the costs and lack of accuracy in traditional methods such as the use of erosion pins and plots, the use of radionuclides, especially 137Cs, for measuring the amount of erosion and deposition and sediment budget components is of great importance today. One of the important advantages of these methods, which has attracted the attention of researchers especially in recent decades, is the possibility of measuring soil redistribution due to water erosion in slopes and watersheds and even on the scale of laboratory plots. Accurately estimation of sediment budget components is essential for estimating erosion rates and planning effective soil conservation measures in any region. Therefore, this research aims to estimate the sediment budget components at the hillslope scale using topographic metrics.
Materials and Methods
Due to the possibility of using the results of previous researches and the availability of a digital elevation model with a spatial accuracy of one meter obtained from a drone photogrammetry, the present study was conducted in the control sub-watershed of the Khamsan representative paired watershed in Kurdistan province. To investigate the effect of the slope angle and curvature on erosion and sedimentation, soil sampling was done at 31 points in a 200-m grid with a systematic-random method and also at 48 points on six transects. After preparation of the soil samples including air and freeze drying and passing through a 63-micron sieve, 293 grams of soil were sent to the laboratory in special containers for the measurement of 137Cs. Also, distribution maps of topographic metrics were extracted using the digital elevation model in ArcGIS 10.8 software. Then, a distribution map of soil erosion/redistribution was prepared using the 137Cs inventory points and work unit approach. Additionally, the components of the sediment budget including total erosion, total sedimentation, net erosion and sediment delivery ratio were calculated for 14 hillslopes in the studied sub-watershed. Then, in order to check the normality of the data in the 14 studied hillslopes, the Kolmogorov Smirnov test was used, and according to the normality of the data, the correlation between the topographic metrics and the sediment budget components at the hillslope scale was checked using the Pearson correlation test. Finally, regression equations were presented to estimate the sediment budget components using topographic metrics.
Results and Discussion
According to the results of this study on the 14 studied hillslopes, specific total erosion ranged from 0.93 to 7.52 t ha-1yr-1, while the specific total deposition ranged from 0.03 to 0.51 t ha-1yr-1. These findings indicated that a significant percentage of erosion had been exported from the hillslopes. Specific net erosion was also calculated between 0.79 and 7.45 t ha-1 yr-1, which indicates the sediment delivery ratio between 0.84 and 1.00 for the investigated hillslopes. The results indicate that the correlation between erosion (total and net) and sediment delivery ratio with slope angle, topographic factor, and stream power index is significant and negative. These findings indicate the dominant effect of dryland farming on increased erosion in gentler slopes and downstream areas, in the upstream regions of the slopes, although the slope was steeper, erosion was minimal due to less soil disturbance and rangeland usage. Consequently, in this study, the interpretation of relationships and regression equations utilized the results of land use and its changes along the slope profile.
Conclusion and Suggestions
The inner area of ​​the Khamsan watershed includes a low-slope plain with the predominant land use of rainfed agriculture, which continues to parts of the surrounding steep slopes, and similar conditions can be seen in the sub-watersheds, including the control sub-watershed. The conditions of land use changes from the upstream to the downstream of the hillslopes around the rainfed lands have relatively similar. Therefore, the regression equations presented in this study are applicable in the hillslopes of the Khamsan representative paired watershed and other similar watersheds. Finally, it is suggested to extract topographical metrics using digital height models with different spatial accuracies and use them in estimations. It is also recommended that a land management plan be developed for the studied area, taking into account the significant role of land use in erosion and sediment production, with adjustments and land use changes implemented based on the potential of each section.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Abbasi M, najafi nejad A, berdi sheikh V, azim mohseni M. 2017. Investigating land use and slope effects on soil properties, runoff and sediment using rainfall simulator case study of kechik Watershed in Golestan Province. Environmental Erosion Research. 6: 104-24. (In persian).
Afshar FA, Ayoubi S, Jalalian A. 2010. Soil redistribution rate and its relationship with soil organic carbon and total nitrogen using 137Cs technique in a cultivated complex hillslope in western Iran. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity.101(8):606-614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2010.03.008
Arata L, Meusburger K, Frenkel E, A’Campo-Neuen A, Iurian AR, Ketterer ME, Mabit L, Alewell C. 2016. Modelling deposition and erosion rates with radionuclides (MODERN) e Part 1: A new ronversion model to derive soil redistribution rates from inventories of fallout radionuclides. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity.162-163:45-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.05.008
Bayat R, Moradi S. 2014. Review of research conducted on the sediment delivery ratio. Extension and Development of Watershed Management. 2(5): 27-36. (In persian).
Cammeraat LH. 2002. A review of two strongly contrasting geomorphological systems within the context of scale. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 27(11): 1201-1222. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.421
Cerdan O, Govers G, Le Bissonnais Y, Van Oost K, Poesen J, Saby N, Dostal T. 2010. Rates and spatial variations of soil erosion in Europe: A study based on erosion plot data. Geomorphology. 122(1-2): 167-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.06.011
Cerdan O, Le Bissonnais Y, Govers G, Lecomte V, Van Oost K, Couturier A, Dubreuil N. 2004. Scale effect on runoff from experimental plots to catchments in agricultural areas in Normandy. Journal of Hydrology. 299(1-2):4-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.02.017
Chiu YJ, Chang KT, Chen YC, Chao JH, Lee HY. 2011. Estimation of soil erosion rates in a subtropical mountain watershed using 137Cs radionuclide. Natural Hazards. 59(1): 271-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9749-0
Collins AL, Walling DE, Leeks GJL. 1997. Source type ascription for fluvial suspended sediment based on a quantitative composite fingerprinting technique. Catena. 29:1-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(96)00064-1
Conforti M, Aucelli PP, Robustelli G, Scarciglia F. 2011. Geomorphology and GIS analysis for mapping gully erosion susceptibility in the Turbolo stream catchment (Northern Calabria, Italy). Natural Hazards. 56(3): 881-898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9598-2
Du P, Walling DE. 2011. Using 137Cs measurements to investigate the influence of erosion and soil redistribution on soil properties. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 69(5): 717-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2011.01.022
Evrard O, Laceby PJ, Huon S, Lefevre I, Sengtaheuanghoung O, Ribolz O. 2016.Combinig multiple fallout radionuclides (137Cs., 7Be., 210Pbex) to investigate temporal sediment source dynamics in tropical ephemeral river systems. Journal of Soils Sediments. 16: 1130-1144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1316-y
farhoodi M, mirzaei H, kavyan A, safari A. 2015. Comparison and evaluation of different methods to estimate sediment delivery ratio in three different climates of Iran. Geography and Environmental Planning. 26(3): 255-274. (In Persian).
Glenn NF, Streutker DR, Chadwick DJ, Thackray GD, Dorsch SJ.  2006. Analysis of LiDAR-derived topographic information for characterizing and differentiating landslide morphology and activity. Geomorphology. 73: 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.07.006
Govers G, Quine TA, Desmet PJ, Walling DE. 1996. The relative contribution of soil tillage and overland flow erosion to soil redistribution on agricultural land. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 21(10): 929-946. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(199610)21:10<929::AID-ESP631>3.0.CO;2-C
Govers G, Van Oost K, Poesen J. 2006. Responses of a semi-arid landscape to human
disturbance: A simulation study of the interaction between rock fragment cover, soil erosion and land use change. Geoderma. 133: 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.03.034
Heckrath G, Djurhuus J, Quine TA, Van Oost K, Govers G, Zhang Y. 2005. Tillage erosion and its effect on soil properties and crop yield in Denmark. Journal of Environmental Quality. 34(1):312-324. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2005.0312a
Jiang P, Thelen KD. 2004. Effect of soil and topographic properties on crop yield in a north-central corn–soybean cropping system. Agronomy Journal. 96(1):252-258. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2004.0252
Khaledi Darvishan A, Sadeghi SHR, Homaee M, Arabkhedri M. 2021. Sediment Budgeting in Laboratory Plots under Rainfall Simulation. Watershed Management Research. 34(2): 15-31. (In Persian). https://doi:10.22092/wmej.2020.123819.1164
Kikuchi T, Kohzu A, Ouchi T, Fukushima T. 2020. Quantifying the sources and removal of nitrate in riparian and lotic environments based on land use and topographic metrics of the watershed. Ecological Indicators. 116: 106535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106535
Krein A, Petticrew E, Udelhoven T. 2003. The use of fine sediment fractal dimensions and colour to determine sediment sources in a small watershed. Catena. 53(2): 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(03)00021-3
Li M, Shi, X Shen Z, Yang E, Bao H, Ni Y. 2019. Effect of hillslope aspect on landform characteristics and erosion rates. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 191: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7760-1
Li X, McCarty GW, Karlen DL, Cambardella CA. 2018. Topographic metric predictions of soil redistribution and organic carbon in Iowa cropland fields. Catena. 160: 222-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.09.026
Liu QQ, Singh VP, Xiang H. 2005. Plot erosion model using gray relational analysis method. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. 10(4):288-294. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2005)10:4(288)
Maetens W, Vanmaercke M, Poesen J, Jankauskas B, Jankauskiene G, Ionita. I. 2012. Effects of land use on annual runoff and soil loss in Europe and the Mediterranean: A meta-analysis of plot data. Progress in Physical Geography.36(5):599-653. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133312451303
Masroor M, Sajjad H, Rehman S, Singh R, Rahaman MH, Sahana M, Avtar R. 2021. Analysing the relationship between drought and soil erosion using vegetation health index and RUSLE models in Godavari Middle Sub-basin, India. Geoscience Frontiers. 13(2): 101312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101312
Meshkat M, Amanian N, Talebi A, Kiani-Harchegani M, Rodrigo-Comino J. 2019. Effects of roughness coefficients and complex hillslope morphology on runoff variables under laboratory conditions. Water. 11(12): 2550.  https://doi.org/10.3390/w11122550
Mombini A, Amanian N, Talebi A, Kiani-Harchegani M, Rodrigo-Comino J. 2021. Surface roughness effects on soil loss rate in complex hillslopes under laboratory conditions. Catena. 206: 105503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105503
Morgan RPC, Morgan DDV, Finney HJ. 1984. A predictive model for the assessment of soil erosion risk. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research.30: 245-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8634(84)80025-6
Nosrati K, Govers G, Ahmadi H, Sharifi F, Amoozegar M, Merckx R, Vanmaercke M. 2011. An exploratory study on the use of enzyme activities as sediment tracers: biochemical fingerprints? International Journal of Sediment Research. 26: 136-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6279(11)60082-6
Park YS, Kim J, Kim NW, Kim SJ, Jeon JH, Engel BA, Lim KJ. 2010. Development of new R, C and SDR modules for the SATEEC GIS system. Computers and Geosciences. 36(6): 726-734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2009.11.005
Porto P, Callegari G. 2022. Comparing long‐term observations of sediment yield with estimates of soil erosion rate based on recent 137Cs metrics. Results from an experimental catchment in Southern Italy. Hydrological Processes. 36(9): e14663. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14663
Rajaei H, khodashenas S, Esmaili K. 2017. Laboratory Analysis of Energy Losses in Gabion Steeped Spillways with and without Sedimentation at Upstream. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage.11(5):900-910. (In Persian).
Ritchie JC, Ritchie CA, 2007. Bibliography of publications of 137-cesium studies related to erosion and sediment deposition. Available from: https://www.ars.usda.gov/Main/docs.htm?docid¼15237
Rodrigo Comino J, Iserloh T, Lassu T, Cerdà A, Keestra SD, Prosdocimi M, Brings C, Marzen M, Ramos MC, Senciales JM, Sinoga JR. 2016. Quantitative comparison of initial soil erosion processes and runoff generation in spanish and german vineyards. Science of the Total Environment.565:1165-1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.163
Sac MM, Ugur A, Yener G, Ozden B. 2008. Estimates of soil erosion using cesium-137 tracer models. Environmental Monitoring Assessment. 136: 461e467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9700-8
Sadeghi SHR, Raeisi MB, Hazbavi Z. 2018. Influence of freeze-only and freezing-thawing cycles on splash erosion. International Soil and Water Conservation Research. 6(4): 275-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2018.07.004
Samadzadeh R, Pourmohammad S. 2018. Modeling soil erosion and sediment production using morgan-morgan finney (mmf) method in the Gazaz-Chay Khalkhal Watershed. Quantitative Geomorphological Research. 4(2): 75-89.
Sedighi F, Darvishan AK, Zare MR. 2021. Effect of watershed geomorphological characteristics on sediment redistribution. Geomorphology. 375: 107559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107559
Sedighi F, Khaledi Darvishan A, Golosov V, Zare MR, Spalevic V. 2022. Influence of land use on changes of sediment budget components: western Iran case study. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 46(6): 838-851. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-011X.3046
Sedighi F, Khaledi Darvishan A, Zare MR. 2020. Assessment of the Slop Gradient on the Estimated Erosion and Sediment Delivery Ratio by Using 137Cs in the Khamsan Representative Watershed. Watershed Management Research. 33(3): 2-19. (In Persian). https://doi:10.22092/wmej.2019.127505.1252
Sharib J, Tugi DFA, Ishak MT, Anthonius C, Adziz MIA, Jaffary NAM. 2023. A study of soil erosion and sedimentation between two different seasons in sembrong catchment using cesium-137. Jurnal Sains Nuklear Malaysia. 35(2): 58-68.
Sherestha M.k. 2010. Soil erosion modeling using remote sensing and GIS, Case of study of Jhikhu Khola Watershed, Nepal. Journal of Nepal Geologyical Society. 41: 7-15.
Tahoori P, Parvin MR. 2016. conservation and sustainable use of soil and its stand in international environmental law. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 18(2): 145-161. https://sid.ir/paper/356203/en
Van den Putte A, Govers G, Diels J, Gillijns K, Demuzere M. 2010. Assessing the effect of soil tillage on crop growth: A meta-regression analysis on european crop yields under conservation agriculture. Europian Journal of Agronomy. 33: 231–241.
Vannoppen W, Vanmaercke M, De Baets S, Poesen J. 2015. A review of the mechanical effects of plant roots on concentrated flow erosion rates. Earth-Science Reviews. 150: 666-678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.08.011
Velasco H, Astorga RT, Joseph D, Antoine JS, Mabit L, Toloza A, Walling DE. 2018. Adapting the Caesium-137 technique to document soil redistribution rates associated with traditional cultivation practices in Haiti. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 183: 7-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.12.008
Venteris ER, McCarty GW, Ritchie JC, Gish T. 2004. Influence of management history and landscape variables on soil organic carbon and soil redistribution. Soil Science. 169(11): 787-795. https://doi.10.1097/01.ss.0000148742.75369.55
Walling DE, He Q, Whelan PA. 2003. Using Cs-137 metrics to validate the application of the AGNPS and ANSWERS erosion and sediment yield models in two small devon catchments. Soil and Tillage Research. 69:27-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(02)00126-5
Walling DE, He Q, Zhang Y. 2014. Conversion models and related software. In: Guidelines for Using Fallout Radionuclides to Assess Erosion and Effectiveness of Soil Conservation Strategies. Iaea-Tecdoc-1741: 125-148.
Walling DE, Zhang Y, He Q. 2007. Models for converting metrics of environmental radionuclide inventories (137Cs, Excess 210Pb, and 7Be) to estimates of soil erosion and deposition rates (Including Software for Model Implementation), Department of Geography, University of Exeter, UK. 87 p.
Wang H, Zhang GH, Li NN, Zhang BJ, Yang HY. 2019. Soil erodibility as impacted by vegetation restoration strategies on the Loess Plateau of China. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms.44(3):796-807. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4531
Xie Y, Yuan F, Zhan T, Kang C, Chi Y. 2018. Geochemical and isotopic characteristics of sediments for the Hulun Buir Sandy Land, northeast China: implication for weathering, recycling and dust provenance. Catena. 160: 170-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.09.008
Young CJ, Liu S, Schumacher JA, Schumacher TE, Kaspar TC, McCarty GW, Jaynes DB. 2014. Evaluation of a model framework to estimate soil and soil organic carbon redistribution by water and tillage using 137Cs in two US Midwest agricultural fields. Geoderma. 232: 437-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.05.019
Zapata F. (Ed.). 2002. Handbook for the assessment of soil erosion and sedimentation using environment radionuclides. Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48054-9
Zarei R, Khaledi Darvishan A. 2020. The role of surface sealing caused by subsequent rainfall in the runoff components at the Kojour Watershed Mazandaran. Watershed Management Research. 33(4): 77-93. (In Persian). https://doi.10.22092/wmej.2020.123725.1161
Zhao J, Wang, Z, Dong Y, Yang Z, Govers G. 2022. How soil erosion and runoff are related to land use, topography and annual precipitation: Insights from a meta-analysis of erosion plots in China. Science of the Total Environment. 802: 149665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149665

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 16 November 2024
  • Revise Date: 07 January 2025
  • Accept Date: 18 March 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics