تحلیل عاملی موانع مشارکت جوامع محلی در طرح‏های احیای زیستی و بیابان‌زدایی طرح ترسیب کربن در منطقه‌ی لپویی، زرقان، استان فارس

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه هرمزگان، دانشکده منابع طبیعی وکشاورزی ،دانشجوی دکتری بیابان زدایی

2 دانشگاه هرمزگان-دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی-گروه مرتع و آبخیزداری

3 گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران

4 گروه مهندسی منابع طبیعی، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه هرمزگان

چکیده

این پژوهش با هدف شناخت و تلخیص موانع مشارکت جوامع محلی در طرح‏های احیای زیستی و بیابان‌زدایی در منطقه‌ی لپویی استان فارس انجام شده ‌است. این تحقیق به‌لحاظ هدف از نوع تحقیقات، کاربردی، ازلحاظ گردآوری داده‌ها از نوع مطالعات پیمایشی، از نظر مهار متغیرها، از نوع مطالعات میدانی و از نظر روش تحقیق، از نوع مطالعات اکتشافی بود. جامعه‌ی آماری مطالعه 600 خانوار فعال عضو تعاونی عمران و توسعه‌ی پایدار لپویی فارس بودند. حجم نمونه با استفاده از جدول کرجسی و مورگان، 234 نفر برآورد شد. ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات در این پژوهش پرسشنامه‏ای بود که روایی آن به‌وسیله‌ی‌ گروه متخصصان و پایایی آن با محاسبه‌ی ضریب آلفای کرونباخ (7/0α >) تأیید شد. واکاوی داده‏ها ‌با کاربرد نرم‏افزار SPSS18 و AMOS انجام شد. در بخش توصیفی برای تحلیل نتایج از شاخص‌های مرکزیت (میانگین و نما) و شاخص‌های پراکندگی (دامنه‌ی تغییرات، واریانس و انحراف معیار) و در بخش استنباطی از تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی، برای عامل‌بندی موانع استفاده شد. نتایج نشان دادند که مهم‌ترین موانع مشارکت جوامع محلی در طرح ترسیب کربن را می‌توان در شش عامل کلی نبودِ اعتماد و باور متقابل، ناآگاهی و ‌نبودِ وسایل ارتباط‌جمعی، موانع اداری و نهادی، موانع اجرایی، نبود حمایت و پشتیبانی دولت و نبودِ نیازسنجی و جلب رضایت مردم طبقه‏بندی کرد، که درمجموع 83/36% از واریانس کل را تبیین کردند. در نتیجه‌گیری کلی نیز اعتبار این موانع از راه تحلیل عاملی تأیید شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Factor Analysis of Obstacles to the Local Communities Participation in the Biological Restoration and Desertification Plans of Carbon Sequestration Project in the Lapui County, Fars Province

نویسندگان [English]

  • Alizamen Rahemh Ardakani 1
  • Yahya Esmaeilpour 2
  • Yaser Mohammadi 3
  • Hamid Gholami 4
1 danshgoi.beiabanzadai
2 Natural Resources Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture Engineering and Natural Resource, Hormozgan University, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
3 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
4 Natural Resources Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resource, Hormozgan University, Bandar Abbas, Iran
چکیده [English]

The aim of this study was to discover the Obstacles of local community’s participation in biological restoration and desertification control plans in the Lapui County, Fars Province. The study is an applied research in terms of purpose, a survey study in terms of collecting data, a field study in terms of controlling variables, and a exploration study in terms of research method. The statistical population of the study consisted of 600 active households of Sustainable Development Cooperative in the Lapui County. Using the Morgan's and Krejcy's tables, the sample size was determined to 234 households. The data gathering tool was a questionnaire whose validity had been confirmed by a panel of experts, and its reliability was confirmed by the Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α > 0.7). The data analysis was conducted by using the SPSS18 and AMOS software. In order to analyze the results, in descriptive section, the centrality (mean and mode), and the dispersion (range of variations, variance, and standard deviation) statistics were calculated, and for the inferential part of the analysis, an exploratory factor analysis was used to factorize the barriers. Results indicated that the most important barriers to participation of local communities in the carbon sequestration project can be identified in six categories: lack of mutual trust and belief, lack of awareness and information channels, administrative and institutional barriers, the implementation barriers, lack of government support, and lack of community needs assessment and satisfaction, which explained a sum of 83.36% of the total variance. The credibility of these barriers was also confirmed by the confirmatory factor analysis.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • barriers
  • biological restoration and desertification control
  • Carbon sequestration
  • local communities
  • participation

مراجع

Borrini-Feyerabend G. 1999. Collaborative management of protected areas‖, in S. Stolton and N. Dudley (eds.), Partnerships for Protection: New Strategies for Planning and Management for Protected Areas, Earthscan, London. Bozarjmehri Kh, Khatami S, Naderi M, Sarbaraghi Moghaddam P. 2016. Investigating the role of participatory projects in women empowerment and environmental conservation. Case study: Sarbisheh County. National Conference on Women and Sustainability of Natural and Environmental Resources in Rural Areas, Mashhad. 1–16. (In Persian).
National Research Council. 2008. Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12434.
Dastoorani MT, Talebi A, Nafarzadegan A. 2009. Investigate the Importance and strategies of public participation development in watershed management. Forest and Rangeland Quarterly. 84(8): 79–74. (In Persian).
Hassan Nejad M, Kohansal M R, Ghorbani M. 2012. Factors affecting the participation of rural development groups in executive education by the International Carbon Policy Project, Eighth Biennial of Iranian Agricultural Economics. 6(1):74–78.‌ (In Persian).
Li‐tze Hu & Peter M. Bentler. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 6(1): 1–55.
Karimi Z. 2016. The role of operators in the conservation and management of the watershed, 11th  National Conference on Watershed Management in Iran. Participatory Development in Watershed Management. 45: 181-196.(In Persian).
Khalighi NA, Chakoshi B, Kia M. 2006. Investigating the role of indigenous knowledge, immigration and property of villagers in operation of rangelands (Chakand Watershed-Birjand County). Journal of  Natural Resources. 59(3): 757–741. (In Persian).
Mahmoudi C,  Mahdavi Kh, Lotfi Sh. 2014. The study of the effective factors upon participation of beneficiaries about conservation, rehabilitation and utilization of ranges (Case study: Roodbar Khoortab Watershed Area, city of Nour). Journal of Conservation and Utilization of Natural Resources. 2 (1): 64– 49. (In Persian).
Meinzen-Dick R. 1997. Farmer participation in irrigation–20 years of experience and lessons for the future. Irrigation and Drainage Systems. 11(2): 103–118.
Mohammadi Kangarani H, Malek Hosseini B. Safi Khani S. 2016. The role of Participation in watershed management policies. 11th National Conference on Watershed Management. April 19–21, Yasouj University. (In Persian).
Mohammadi Y, Pirmoradi AH. 2016. Rural mistrust theory for participation in development plans using the qualitative method of data theory. Sixth National Congress of Agricultural Extension and Education and Natural Science. 26 October, Shiraz University. (In Persian).
Meinzen-Dick R. 1997. Farmer participation in irrigation–20 years of experience and lessons for the future. Irrigation and Drainage Systems. 11(2): 103–118.
Namaki SM, Ghafouri A, Shadfar S, Shadmani A. 2011. Analysis of the status of indigenous and official knowledge of watersheds and its role in the sustainability of a comprehensive drought system in watersheds. The First National Conference on Drought and Climate Change, Karaj, Research Center for water scarcity and Drought in Agriculture and Natural Resources. 52(1):113–124. (In Persian).
Parkes MW, Morrison KE, Bunch MJ, Hallstrom LK, Neudoerffer RC, Venema HD, Waltner-Toews D. 2010. Towards integrated governance for water, health and social- ecological systems: The watershed governance prism. Journal of Global Environmental Change. 20(2): 693–704.
Rahemi Ardakani A, Esmaeilour Y, Mohammadi Y, Gholami H. 2017. Investigating the role of empowerment education (Rural Participatory Evaluation) in watershed plans, Lapouyi Case Study of Shiraz. The First Conference on Shiraz Ecosystem Resilience Focusing on Water Resources Management. 4 March 2017. Shiraz. (In Persian).
Rahemi Ardakani A. 2011. Investigating the role of effective factors on people's participation in watershed plans in the Lapouyi District of Shiraz, M.Sc. Dissertation, Islamic Azad University, Arsanjan. (in Persian).
Reiki M. 2017. Prediction of the effects of changing the pattern of cropping on groundwater properties using Bisin network, Master's thesis, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences & Natural Resources, Year 4, Issue 14. 144 p. (In Persian).
Reiki M, Hossein Alizadeh M, Islami I. 2016. Investigation of the public participation in projects of cropping pattern change in Ali-Abad Region (Golestan Province). Extension and Development of Watershed Management. 4(14):33–38.
Salehpour Jam A, Sarreshtehdari A, Tabatabaei MR. 2017. Prioritizing preventing factors affecting on stakeholders' participation in watershed plans based on experts' idea, case study: Watershed area surrounding city of Tehran. Watershed Engineering Management. 9(4): 441–450. (In Persian).
Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H. 2003.  Evaluating the fit of structural equation models:Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online. 8 (2): 23–74.
Tahmasebian S, Hamidiyan M, Saghari M, Momeni A. 2014. Obstacles for the participation of exploiters in the implementation of Ilam Province rangeland projects (case study: Exploits of Malekhashyeh City). 1(5):77–93. (In Persian).
Zabetian J. 2011. Design a pattern for participatory planning in rural areas. Case study: Lapoyee Fars Province, Final report of research. Tehran: Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, Agricultural Planning, Economic and Rural Development Research Institute. 144 p. (In Persian).
Zarei M, Azmudeh A, Amirnezhad H, Pirnia A. 2013. Investigating the factors afecting non-participation of waters in watershed projects (Case study: Berenjestanak Watershed). Journal of Natural Resources Economics. 9 (33): 63–76. (In Persian).          

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 11 اردیبهشت 1397
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 29 تیر 1397
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 02 مرداد 1397

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار